SPECIALS to the ACSA...
 (several articles that speak the truth)
     Index:
         Editorial | Letter from Leonard Heiskell
| Bush in Uniform | Records Back Bush | Bush in the National Guard

FIRST A BRIEF EDITORIAL: Anyone notice "the Ugly Democrat" syndrome,  a political ploy often used by Rockefeller Democrats to "ugly up" the conversation??  Thank DAVID ROCKEFELLER for that -he's pulling the strings behind his nephew and other Dems attacking President Bush, he wants Kerry in office giving Exxon/Mobil free reign over Iraq's enormous Oil wealth, not Iraq itself.  Saddam Hussein himself may be exceeded in terms of commission of Human Rights violations by the collective acts of the descendents of John D. Rockefeller (Sr. and Jr.), who have promoted Wars since the 1930's, and prospered by ripping the businesses and oil/natural resources right out from under where these wars take us, while ripping us all off by tax and spend economics of war.  Is it not time for us to note that the Democrats get us INTO War and the Republicans have to win them? 

This "smer process" is a key part of the Rockefeller Methodical Deployment used by their businesses for stealing oil and resources and puppet-izing foreign regions: they manipulate us and they manipulate the intended zones, and then use America as a vehicle for their own prosperity, ignoring the thousands or millions of American's lost in time of War.  They instigate the threat, then perforate our ability to defend, so we have to pay them for the mechanistics, technology and fuel to defend ourselves.  It's time we put an end to that and allowed resources and business to engage in acts more noble, like Space Exploration and curing Cancer, rather than just perpetuating meaningless research and global conflict, that just contributes to the problem, doesn't it?  No longer the false facade of "Rockefeller University" and "Rockefeller Foundation" and a redistribution of their control to businesses owned and operated by Americans.  Not just by "Rockefeller puppets".

Rest assured: John Kerry in office means Exxon/Mobil or another Rockefeller business will get dominion over Iraqi Oil by installing a puppet business over it, as they have in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere... The consequences?  Further terrorism for tyranny and further out-casting by the rest of the world.  It is THAT behavior which is the source of our problems as a country, every time the Rockefellers go carpet-bagging their way into another country to steal it's energy resources, they further inflame outrage against America, the world not realizing that the Rockefellers are acting on their own greed and their own behalf.  A world unable to differentiate between a country's behavior and that of individual businessmen, can't tell the difference unless we act to quash the innate and deliberate theft that so frequently attributes the behavior of Rockefeller Businesses.  There is no real power or fiscal control gained for America when the Rockefellers do what they do, however there is enormous loss to be had if we do not reign them in.  This is clerly not their country, they live here, they stem from Hungary, and from an ancestry prolific in snake oil and liniment sales, horse thievery and anti-labor militant behavior. Yet we find them siding with labor against their own companies, so that labor will promote their candidates. These two faced con artists who've so taken America with the seduction of their entertainment consortiums and energy, power and transportation businesses, are deceitful enemies of freedom, who use our own commitment to it to march us off and freely release them on countries who attack us, for the value it has to Rockefeller Inc. And when we step out of line, they attack our reputations in the lowest manner. Evidence the attacks on President Bush's military record.  And on black icons in America.  It's all "the Ugly Democrat" speaking out of both sides of his mouth.  - ED.

Published in The Washington Times, Saturday, February 21, 2004:


Letters to the Editor (Page A-12)                                                    top
by Edgar F. Heiskell, III
USAF Reserve, Retired

'White-knuckled' service
 
    There is no reason for George Bush or his supporters to be timid in
dealing with attacks on his military record. Let the performance evaluation written
by a superior officer and made public last week be the starting point: "Lt.
Bush is a dynamic outstanding young officer. He clearly stands out as a top
notch fighter interceptor pilot."

    For the relatively few men who have ever been able to meet the rigorous
requirements of becoming combat-qualified in a supersonic fighter used in the
defense of our country, those words speak volumes. We know, for starters, that
Lt. Bush had to demonstrate sound character, a solid background in physics and
math, and be physically fit before he could even begin pilot training. He
then spent 53 weeks in the Air Force pilot training program, mastering the
subject matter of aerospace engineering and meteorology in the classroom and then
going out to the airfield to fly airplanes.

    Though the work of pilots has been romanticized and glamorized during the
past century, the fact is that being a military pilot is difficult and
dangerous. Lt. Bush had to start first in a single-engine Cessna 172 to demonstrate
that he could handle that airplane. Within six weeks, he moved into the Cessna
T-37, a twin-jet trainer in which the pilot not only learns to fly solo at
night and in terrible weather conditions, but also begins learning the aerobatic
maneuvers he will need to use in combat. At the time of Lt. Bush's pilot
training, we were not only at war in Vietnam. The Cold War threat to the
continental United States posed by thousands of strategic bombers in the Soviet Union
was very real and extremely ominous.

    At the midyear point in his training, the pilot trainee is put into the
cockpit of the T-38, a supersonic fighter-type aircraft that, if mishandled in
aerobatic maneuvers or on final approach, can reduce you to a little cinder in
a rather large crater. The physical and intellectual demands on a young man
learning to fly a supersonic jet fighter cannot be overstated, and Lt. Bush
obviously measured up. In order to earn his coveted silver wings, he had to
master the aircraft at its limits of performance, pulling six and seven "g's" in
combat maneuvers, and then be able to navigate back to base and make precision
approaches on instruments, often in high winds and poor weather. All the while,
he was being tested and challenged by Air Force instructors who were known
for producing the finest pilots in the world. They knew that a pilot with
shortcomings would be killed eventually, either by his own mistakes or by the enemy,
so they had to make sure every Air Force pilot got it right.

    After successfully completing the 53-week pilot training program, Lt.
Bush entered combat training in the F-102, a 20-ton fighter-interceptor. Every
day for six months, he would walk onto the tarmac and strap on that baby, light
the afterburner and go rolling down the runway to a takeoff speed of more than
170 mph, knowing he had 70,000 pounds of jet fuel on his back and one mistake
or a failure of his only engine could end his life in a massive fireball. In
the air, he would practice the intercept maneuvers that might someday knock
out a Soviet bomber headed for New York, Chicago or Los Angeles; search for the
target on radar at a closing speed of possibly 1,200 mph; acquire it; activate
his weapons systems; maneuver for the kill; launch the radar-guided missiles;
and maneuver into a stern attack position to use the heat-seekers in case of
a miss. It was white-knuckle flying, culminating in a 170-mph touchdown and
wishing the flight suit didn't always get soaked with sweat.

    Once combat-qualified in the F-102 and assigned to an Air National Guard
unit, Lt. Bush was in every sense an asset to our military. He could have been
ordered back to active duty at any time, whether for service in Vietnam or
with the North American Air Defense Command. America's political leadership at
the time chose not to call him up. Nonetheless, Lt. Bush put his life at risk
on a daily basis over a long period of time, and he has nothing for which to
apologize; nor do his friends need to be timid about pointing out his
achievements.
    
    EDGAR F. HEISKELL III
    Air Force Reserve, retired
    Charlottesville, VA
 


George Bush In Uniform
New York Post ^ | 2/11/04 | editorial staff
                                                                                                        top

Posted on 02/11/2004 1:20:17 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
 

In releasing pay records and other previously unavailable documents, the White House hopefully has put to rest the issue of President Bush's Vietnam-era service in the Air National Guard.

"These documents clearly show that the president fulfilled his duties," said White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan.

Indeed, the papers - uncovered this week at the Air Reserve Personnel Center in Denver - outline the days on which Bush was paid in 1972 and 1973, during which time he was trained as a fighter pilot.

They show that he met the requirements of service.

That was confirmed by Lt. Col. Albert Lloyd, who was personnel director of the Texas Air National Guard from 1969 to 1995 and who reviewed the records at the White House's request.

According to Lloyd, the material "proves that he completed his military obligations in a satisfactory manner."

To be sure, Bush has been hit with these same allegations ever since he first ran for office a decade ago.

This year, however, they've taken a decidedly ugly turn.

Democratic National Chairman Terry McAuliffe - who himself never served, and for whom military service was never an issue when Bill Clinton inhabited the White House - has accused the president of having been "AWOL" for part of his service.

Happily, the records prove otherwise.

No, Bush's record in the National Guard doesn't compare with Sen. John Kerry's service in Vietnam.

But the question of whether and how Bush served really isn't relevant in 2004, after four years as commander in chief - just as Clinton's record was no longer considered relevant by voters as he sought a second term (against WWII hero Bob Dole) eight years ago.

Recall that two of this nation's greatest war presidents - Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt - did not have extensive military service (though Lincoln had militia service in the so-called Black Hawk Indian war and FDR served as assistant secretary of the Navy during World War I).

Yet both men saw this nation through some of its darkest days, serving admirably as commander in chief.

George W. Bush's character, particularly when it comes to military matters, no longer needs to be judged by what he did or didn't do over three decades ago.

It's what he's done over the past four years that counts.

And in the face of the worst attack ever perpetrated against the American heartland, this president has performed superbly.

He declared a long-overdue War on Terror - and challenged the rest of the world to finally confront the threat of global terrorism.

In Afghanistan, U.S. forces annihilated the pro-terrorist Taliban government.

They then proceeded to obliterate much of the leadership and operational forces of al Qaeda - forcing Osama bin Laden to flee for his life, with most of his infrastructure destroyed.

In Iraq, the American-led coalition toppled Saddam Hussein from power - finally implementing the official U.S. policy of regime change that had been endorsed by, among others, the Democrat most likely to face Bush this fall.

Sen. John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts.

And now, despite clear and present challenges and dangers, the United States is working deliberately toward the establishment of a democratic regime in Baghdad - which should set an example for the entire Middle East.

It was Kerry who, during the 1992 controversy over Bill Clinton's efforts to evade the draft, declared: "We do not need to divide America over who served and how."

It's advice that Kerry and his bitterly partisan surrogates should recall today.

There simply are too many dangers facing this country abroad - and too many fundamental disagreements between the candidates on how best to meet them - to be focusing an inordinate amount of attention on who did what 30 years ago.

 



Records Back Bush

                                                                                                        top

 
 
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

February 12, 2004

 
Washington - The White House late yesterday released a copy of a dental evaluation President Bush had in the National Guard in Alabama during the Vietnam War to rebut Democrats who have questioned whether the president ever showed up for duty there.

A copy of the dental examination done on Jan. 6, 1973, documents the president serving at Dannelly Air National Guard Base, which is south of Montgomery, Ala., White House press secretary Scott McClellan said in a statement. Earlier in the day, McClellan hardened the White House's defense of Bush's Guard service, saying critics were "trolling for trash" for political gain.

Bush completed most of his National Guard training in Texas, but in 1972 was allowed to leave and perform his duties in Alabama so he could work on a Senate political campaign.

Democrats have been scrutinizing a one-year period of Bush's Guard service that begins in May 1972, saying they've seen no evidence that Bush ever reported for his assignment in Alabama.

Democrats are delving into Bush's service, especially since Vietnam veteran John Kerry has become the Democrats' president front-runner.


Bush and the National Guard: Case Closed
byork@nationalreview.com                                                                              top

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article appears in the March 8, 2004, issue of National Review.

Ask retired Brig. Gen. William Turnipseed whether the press has accurately reported what he said about George W. Bush, and you'll get an earful. "No, I don't think they have," he begins. Turnipseed, the former head of the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group of the Alabama Air National Guard, was widely quoted as saying he never saw Bush in Alabama in 1972, and if the future president had been there, he would remember. In fact, Turnipseed says, he doesn't recall whether Bush was there or not; the young flier, then a complete unknown in Alabama, was never part of the 900-man 187th, so Turnipseed wouldn't have had much reason to notice him. But most reporters haven't been interested in Turnipseed's best recollection. "They don't understand the Guard, they don't want to understand the Guard, and they hate Bush," he says. "So when I say, ‘There's a good possibility that Bush showed up,' why would they put that in their articles?"

 

In recent weeks, Turnipseed has found himself in the middle of a battle in which Democrats have called the president a "deserter" who went "AWOL" for an entire year during his time in the Air National Guard. When Democrats made those accusations — amplified by extensive press coverage — the White House was slow to fight back, insisting that the issue, which came up in the 2000 campaign, was closed and did not merit a response. It was only after NBC's Tim Russert brought the story up during a one-hour interview with the president on February 8 that the White House changed course and released records of the president's Guard service.

 

Those records have not quieted the most determined of the president's enemies — no one who watches the Democratic opposition really believed they would — but they do make a strong case that Bush fulfilled his duties and met the requirements for Air National Guard officers during his service from 1968 to 1973. A look at those records, along with interviews with people who knew Bush at the time, suggests that after all the shouting is over, and some of the basic facts become known, this latest line of attack on the president will come to nothing.

 

FOUR YEARS OF FLYING

The controversy over Bush's service centers on what his critics call "the period in question," that is, the time from May 1972 until May 1973. What is not mentioned as often is that that period was in fact Bush's fifth year in the Guard, one that followed four years of often intense service.

 

Bush joined in May 1968. He went through six weeks of basic training — a full-time job — at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Then he underwent 53 weeks of flight training — again, full time — at Moody Air Force Base in Valdosta, Ga. Then he underwent 21 weeks of fighter interceptor training — full time — at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston. Counting other, shorter, postings in between, by the end of his training period Bush had served two years on active duty.

Certified to fly the F-102 fighter plane, Bush then began a period of frequent — usually weekly — flying. The F-102 was designed to shoot down other fighter planes, and the missions Bush flew were training flights, mostly over the Gulf of Mexico and often at night, in which pilots took turns being the predator and the prey."If you're going to practice how to shoot down another airplane, then you have to have another airplane up there to work on," recalls retired Col. William Campenni, who flew with Bush in 1970 and 1971. "He'd be the target for the first half of the mission, and then we'd switch."

During that period Bush's superiors gave him consistently high ratings as a pilot. "Lt. Bush is an exceptional fighter interceptor pilot and officer," wrote one in a 1972 evaluation. Another evaluation, in 1971, called Bush "an exceptionally fine young officer and pilot" who "continually flies intercept missions with the unit to increase his proficiency even further." And a third rating, in 1970, said Bush "clearly stands out as a top notch fighter interceptor pilot" and was also "a natural leader whom his contemporaries look to for leadership."

All that flying involved quite a bit of work. "Being a pilot is more than just a monthly appearance," says Bob Harmon, a former Guard pilot who was a member of Bush's group in 1971 and 1972. "You cannot maintain your currency by doing just one drill a month. He was flying once or twice a week during that time, from May of 1971 until May of 1972." While the work was certainly not as dangerous as fighting in the jungles of Vietnam, it wasn't exactly safe, either. Harmon remembers a half-dozen Texas Air National Guard fliers who died in accidents over the years, in cluding one during the time Bush was flying. "This was not an endeavor without risk," Harmon notes.

 

THE MOVE TO ALABAMA

The records show that Bush kept up his rigorous schedule of flying through the spring of 1972: He was credited for duty on ten days in March of that year, and seven days in April. Then, as Bush began his fifth year of service in the Guard, he appears to have stepped back dramatically. The records indicate that he received no credit in May, June, July, August, and September 1972. In October, he was credited with two days, and in November he was credited with four. There were no days in December, and then six in January 1973. Then there were no days in February and March.

 

The change was the result of Bush's decision to go to Alabama to work on the Senate campaign of Republican Winton Blount. With an obligation to the Guard, Bush asked to perform equivalent service in Alabama. That was not an unusual request, given that members of the Guard, like everyone else, often moved around the country. "It was a common thing," recalls Brigadier General Turnipseed. "If we had had a guy in Houston, he could have made equivalent training with Bush's unit. It was so common that the guy who wrote the letter telling Bush to come didn't even tell me about it."

The president's critics have charged that he did not show up for service — was "AWOL" — in Alabama. Bush says he did serve, and his case is supported by records showing that he was paid and given retirement credit for days of service while he was known to be in Alabama. The records also show that Bush received a dental examination on January 6, 1973, at Dannelly Air National Guard base, home of the 187th (January 6 was one of the days that pay records show Bush receiving credit for service). And while a number of Guard members at the base say they do not remember seeing Bush among the roughly 900 men who served there during that time, another member, a retired lieutenant named John Calhoun, says he remembers seeing Bush at the base several times.

What seems most likely is that Bush was indeed at Dannelly, but there was not very much for a non-flying pilot to do. Flying fighter jets involves constant practice and training; Bush had to know when he left Texas that he would no longer be able to engage in either one very often, which meant that he would essentially leave flying, at least for some substantial period of time. In addition, the 187th could not accommodate another pilot, at least regularly. "He was not going to fly," says Turnipseed. "We didn't have enough airplanes or sorties to handle our own pilots, so we wouldn't have done it for some guy passing through."

On the other hand, showing up for drills was still meeting one's responsibility to the Guard. And, as 1973 went along, the evidence suggests that Bush stepped up his work to make up for the time he had missed earlier. In April of that year, he received credit for two days; in May, he received credit for 14 days; in June, five days; and in July, 19 days. That was the last service Bush performed in the Guard. Later that year, he asked for and received permission to leave the Guard early so he could attend Harvard Business School. He was given an honorable discharge after serving five years, four months, and five days of his original six-year commitment.

The records indicate that, despite his move to Alabama, Bush met his obligation to the Guard in the 1972-73 year. At that time, Guardsmen were awarded points based on the days they reported for duty each year. They were given 15 points just for being in the Guard, and were then required to accumulate a total of 50 points to satisfy the annual requirement. In his first four years of service, Bush piled up lots of points; he earned 253 points in his first year, 340 in his second, 137 in his third, and 112 in his fourth. For the year from May 1972 to May 1973, records show Bush earned 56 points, a much smaller total, but more than the minimum requirement (his service was measured on a May-to-May basis because he first joined the Guard in that month in 1968).

Bush then racked up another 56 points in June and July of 1973, which met the minimum requirement for the 1973-74 year, which was Bush's last year of service. Together, the record "clearly shows that First Lieutenant George W. Bush has satisfactory years for both '72-'73 and '73-'74, which proves that he completed his military obligation in a satisfactory manner," says retired Lt. Col. Albert Lloyd, a Guard personnel officer who reviewed the records at the request of the White House.

All in all, the documents show that Bush served intensively for four years and then let up in his fifth and sixth years, although he still did enough to meet Guard requirements. The records also suggest that Bush's superiors were not only happy with his performance from 1968 to 1972, but also happy with his decision to go to Alabama. Indeed, Bush's evaluating officer wrote in May 1972 that "Lt. Bush is very active in civic affairs in the community and manifests a deep interest in the operation of our government. He has recently accepted the position as campaign manager for a candidate for United States Senate. He is a good representative of the military and Air National Guard in the business world."

Beyond their apparent hope that Bush would be a good ambassador for the Guard, Bush's superiors might have been happy with his decision to go into politics for another reason: They simply had more people than they needed. "In 1972, there was an enormous glut of pilots," says Campenni. "The Vietnam War was winding down, and the Air Force was putting pilots in desk jobs. In '72 or '73, if you were a pilot, active or Guard, and you had an obligation and wanted to get out, no problem. In fact, you were helping them solve their problem."

 

THE UNENDING ATTACK

Despite the evidence, Democrats have continued to accuse the president of shirking his duty during his Guard career. "He went to Alabama for one year," Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe said on ABC on February 1. "He didn't show up. Call it whatever you want, AWOL, it doesn't matter." After Bush made his Guard records public, McAuliffe released a statement saying the documents "create more questions than answers." Other Democrats, as well as an energetic team of liberal columnists and bloggers, echoed McAuliffe's comments.

 

Perhaps the most impressive accomplishment of Bush's detractors is that they managed to sell the idea — mostly unchallenged in the press — that Bush's Air National Guard service consisted of one year during which he didn't show up for duty. Far fewer people asked the question: Just how did Bush become a fighter pilot in the first place? Didn't that involve, say, years of work? Bush's four years of service prior to May 1972 were simply airbrushed out of the picture because many reporters did not believe they were part of the story.

It also seems likely that some of Bush's adversaries used the Guard issue as a way to get at other questions about the president. The Guard record was said to have a bearing on Bush's credibility, on the war in Iraq, on his fitness to lead. In addition, some journalists were nearly obsessed with forcing the president to release medical records from his time in the Guard because they hoped those records might reveal some evidence of drug use. The White House did not release the full set of medical records but did allow reporters to view them; the documents were entirely unexcep tional and contained nothing about drug use.

While all that was going on, both the White House and the Bush reelection campaign seemed consistently to underestimate the ferocity and resolve of the president's adversaries. For weeks, as the controversy grew, the president did nothing to defend himself. Those who wanted to speak up in his defense, like William Campenni and Bob Harmon, were not contacted by the White House; instead, they decided to go public on their own. Even when John Calhoun, the man who remembers Bush in Alabama, sent the White House an e-mail saying he had useful information, he received a stock response, without any indication the White House was interested in what he had to say.

Now the evidence is public; anyone who is interested in learning about Bush's service can do so. In the end, the president had the facts on his side. But he also had the good fortune to have the allegiance of men who feel so intensely about the Guard and their service that they wanted to speak out even if the White House didn't seem to care. Men like Campenni and Harmon were deeply offended when Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry equated Guard service during the Vietnam War with fleeing the country or going to jail. That was simply too much. "I'm not a Bushie," says Harmon. "The thing that got a few of us crawling out from under a rock, at no instigation from the White House, was that Guard service was being portrayed as being like a draft dodger."

                                                    top

Copyright 2004